Speed and throughput ➡Speed and throughput appendix ➡Image and data integrity ➡Image and data integrity appendix ➡Sensor durability ➡Misfeed mana
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Competitive BenChmarkingCanon Marketing ClaimsCanon DR-X10C Scanner Performance3Kodak i780 Scanner Perfo
Competitive BenChmarkingTesting observations and conclusionsThe CanonCanon DR-X10C Scanner does not oer flexible options for the operator to DR-X10C
AppendicesAppendix 3—Part A—Misfeed management—Testing methodology and results Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, com
This appendix defines the job streams used in the multifeed productivity test and the challenge document productivity test.Multifeed productivity test
Workstation Components VersionOptiPlex 755 Minitower:Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6850 (3.0GHz, 4M, VT, 1333MHz FSB)Operating system(s):Genuine Windows
Appendix 3—Part D—Misfeed management—Scanner features and settings profileKodak i780 Scanner configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo setting
Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo settingsCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challe
Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration, continuedCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestPixKof
Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration, continuedCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestPixKof
Canon DR-X10C Scanner, ISIS configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo settingsCanon DR-X10C ISIS Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Docume
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner The test results report the actual throughput of each scanner using real-world scanner configurations.The
Canon DR-X10C ISIS Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestCanon DR-X10C Operator control panel settingsCanon DR-X10C OCP—buzz
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Competitive BenChmarkingReal-world situationCanon DR-X10C Scanner performance in real-world scanning sce
Testing observations and conclusions Operators of the Operators of the Canon DR-X10C Scanner must be constantly vigilant when DR-X10C Scanner must
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Appendice
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡This appe
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Workstati
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Appendix
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon
AppendicesAppendix 1—Testing methodology and results for speed and throughputKodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, compe
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Canon DR-
For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Canon DR-
Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, competitive benchmark tests comparing the Kodak i780 Scanner with VRS to the Canon
Performance of Dust Evasion System Test—detailed results, continued This is a portion of the first image taken. There were streaks both in the image an
Test #2—Determine dust particle size to trigger DR-X10C Dust Detection System—detailed results The intent of this test was to determine under what con
Reference A—Testing configuration details*Test Job 1 Test Job 2 Test Job 3 Test Job 4 Test Job 5 Test Job 6EMC QuickScan Settings200 dpi, bitonal, dupl
Test Job 1 Test Job 2 Test Job 3 Test Job 4 Test Job 5 Test Job 6i780 ISIS driver, main, croppingAggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressiv
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Kodak i780 ScannerCanon DR-X10C ScannerCompetitive BenChmarkingImage and data integrityTesting observati
AppendicesAppendix 2—Testing methodology and results for image and data integrity (OCR read rates)Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Fact CheckCanon DR-X10C Scanner Kodak i780 ScannerVendor’s marketing claim Contact Image Sensor (CIS): “
Competitive BenChmarkingCount on Kodak for consistent and true performance. Count out Canon.ConclusionsThe CanonCanon Scanner, because of its Contact
Commentaires sur ces manuels