Kodak i780 Manuel d'utilisateur

Naviguer en ligne ou télécharger Manuel d'utilisateur pour Adaptateurs de transparence pour scanner Kodak i780. Kodak I780 User's Manual Manuel d'utilisatio

  • Télécharger
  • Ajouter à mon manuel
  • Imprimer
  • Page
    / 34
  • Table des matières
  • MARQUE LIVRES
  • Noté. / 5. Basé sur avis des utilisateurs
Vue de la page 0
Speed and throughput
Speed and throughput appendix
Image and data integrity
Image and data integrity appendix
Sensor durability
Misfeed management
Misfeed management appendix
Real-world environment
Real-world environment appendix
Competitive BenChmarking
Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner
Count on Kodak for consistent and true performance.
Count out Canon.
Canon DR-X10C Scanner
Kodak i780 Scanner
Table of Contents
©Kodak, 2009. Kodak is a trademark of Kodak.
All testing conducted in quality assurance labs at Kodak’s Document Imaging headquarters facility, 2600 Manitou Road, Rochester, NY from November 18th, 2008–December 11th, 2008.
Vue de la page 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 33 34

Résumé du contenu

Page 1 - Table of Contents

Speed and throughput ➡Speed and throughput appendix ➡Image and data integrity ➡Image and data integrity appendix ➡Sensor durability ➡Misfeed mana

Page 2 - Speed and throughput

Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Competitive BenChmarkingCanon Marketing ClaimsCanon DR-X10C Scanner Performance3Kodak i780 Scanner Perfo

Page 3 - Throughput tests

Competitive BenChmarkingTesting observations and conclusionsThe CanonCanon DR-X10C Scanner does not oer flexible options for the operator to DR-X10C

Page 4

AppendicesAppendix 3—Part A—Misfeed management—Testing methodology and results Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, com

Page 5

This appendix defines the job streams used in the multifeed productivity test and the challenge document productivity test.Multifeed productivity test

Page 6 - Image and data integrity

Workstation Components VersionOptiPlex 755 Minitower:Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6850 (3.0GHz, 4M, VT, 1333MHz FSB)Operating system(s):Genuine Windows

Page 7

Appendix 3—Part D—Misfeed management—Scanner features and settings profileKodak i780 Scanner configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo setting

Page 8 - Sensor durability

Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo settingsCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challe

Page 9 - Conclusions

Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration, continuedCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestPixKof

Page 10 - Misfeed management

Canon DR-X10C Scanner, VRS configuration, continuedCanon DR-X10C with VRS Option Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestPixKof

Page 11 - Count out Canon

Canon DR-X10C Scanner, ISIS configuration EMC Captiva QuickScan Pro v6.5.1 demo settingsCanon DR-X10C ISIS Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Docume

Page 12 - Appendices

Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner The test results report the actual throughput of each scanner using real-world scanner configurations.The

Page 13

Canon DR-X10C ISIS Multifeed Productivity Test Challenge Document Productivity TestCanon DR-X10C Operator control panel settingsCanon DR-X10C OCP—buzz

Page 14 - Return to Misfeed management

Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Competitive BenChmarkingReal-world situationCanon DR-X10C Scanner performance in real-world scanning sce

Page 15

Testing observations and conclusions Operators of the Operators of the Canon DR-X10C Scanner must be constantly vigilant when DR-X10C Scanner must

Page 16

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Appendice

Page 17

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡This appe

Page 18

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Workstati

Page 19

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Appendix

Page 20

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon

Page 21 - Real-world environment

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon

Page 22

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡ Return to Real-world environment ➡ Table of Contents ➡Canon

Page 23

AppendicesAppendix 1—Testing methodology and results for speed and throughputKodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, compe

Page 24

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Canon DR-

Page 25

For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here ➡Return to Real-world environment ➡Table of Contents ➡Canon DR-

Page 26

Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of comprehensive, competitive benchmark tests comparing the Kodak i780 Scanner with VRS to the Canon

Page 27

Performance of Dust Evasion System Test—detailed results, continued This is a portion of the first image taken. There were streaks both in the image an

Page 28

Test #2—Determine dust particle size to trigger DR-X10C Dust Detection System—detailed results The intent of this test was to determine under what con

Page 29

Reference A—Testing configuration details*Test Job 1 Test Job 2 Test Job 3 Test Job 4 Test Job 5 Test Job 6EMC QuickScan Settings200 dpi, bitonal, dupl

Page 30

Test Job 1 Test Job 2 Test Job 3 Test Job 4 Test Job 5 Test Job 6i780 ISIS driver, main, croppingAggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressiv

Page 31

Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Kodak i780 ScannerCanon DR-X10C ScannerCompetitive BenChmarkingImage and data integrityTesting observati

Page 32

AppendicesAppendix 2—Testing methodology and results for image and data integrity (OCR read rates)Kodak’s Quality Assurance Team conducted a series of

Page 33

Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Fact CheckCanon DR-X10C Scanner Kodak i780 ScannerVendor’s marketing claim Contact Image Sensor (CIS): “

Page 34 - Overall testing conclusion

Competitive BenChmarkingCount on Kodak for consistent and true performance. Count out Canon.ConclusionsThe CanonCanon Scanner, because of its Contact

Commentaires sur ces manuels

Pas de commentaire